4.5 Article

Anaerobic Co-digestion of Slaughter Residues with Agricultural Waste of Amaranth Quinoa and Wheat

期刊

BIOENERGY RESEARCH
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 1649-1663

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12155-021-10350-9

关键词

Animal waste; Biogas; Bioenergy; Fermentation; Kinetics; Biodegradability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The experimental evaluation of anaerobic co-digestion in Guaranda city shows that co-digestion of slaughterhouse residues with agriculture residues can reduce emissions and prevent pollution. The synergy between slaughterhouse residues and quinoa in the mixture accelerates biodegradability and increases biogas production.
The purpose of this research is to experimentally evaluate the anaerobic co-digestion in the city of Guaranda of slaughterhouse residues (RM) with straw residues from agriculture, such as amaranth residues (AM), quinoa residues (QU) and residues of wheat (TR), to reduce slaughterhouse discharges and prevent contamination of the city. The study was carried out on a laboratory scale in 311-ml biodigesters under mesophilic conditions of 37 degrees C. In addition, sewage sludge was used as inoculum with two relationships between substrate and inoculum (SIR 1:1 and SIR 1:2). The design was completed using three relationships between substrate (RM) and co-substrate (AM, QU and TR): 25:75, 50:50 and 75:25. Anaerobic codigestion resulted in methane yields of 407 ml CH 4 /g VS, with a methane content in the biogas of 77% for the mixture of RM and QU (RM-QU (25:75)). The increase in inoculum in the mixtures composed of RM and QU increased the biodegradability between 17 and 22%. However, in the mixtures of slaughterhouse waste and amaranth (RM-AM (25:75)), a further increase in inoculum reduced biodegradability by 5%. The results revealed that there is a greater synergy between the RM and QU as the percentage of QU in the mixture is increased. This meant that the co-digestion of the RM with the QU accelerates the biodegradability of the mixture, increasing the production of biogas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据