4.7 Article

The inhibition effects of Cu and Ni alloying elements on corrosion of HSLA steel influenced by Halomonas titanicae

期刊

BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY
卷 141, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2021.107884

关键词

Microbiologically influenced corrosion; Iron-reducing bacteria; HSLA steel; Cu alloying element; Ni alloying element

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41806087, 51771180, U1906226]
  2. Key Deployment Project of Center for Ocean Mega-Research of Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences [COMS2019Q13]
  3. Key Projects of China National Key RD Plan [2021YFE0107000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adding a small amount of copper and high nickel content can improve the corrosion resistance of high strength low alloy steel by reducing the number of corrosive bacterial cells. Copper has a stronger inhibitory effect than nickel, with its biofilm inhibition mechanism mainly achieved through the release of bactericidal copper ions.
Halomonas titanicae accelerated steel corrosion by dissimilatory Fe(III) reduction under anaerobic environments, and their adhesion was the key to achieving extracellular electron transfer between cells and Fe(III). This work investigated the inhibition effects of Cu and Ni alloying elements on corrosion of high strength low alloy (HSLA) steel affected by H. titanicae. It was found that both the addition of Cu (1.3%) and high content of Ni (7.2%) brought better corrosion resistance than the steel containing 4.8% Ni via decreasing the amount of sessile bacterial cells. And the inhibition efficiency of Cu with the lower content was stronger than that of Ni with the higher content. Biofilm inhibition mechanisms varied from Cu to Ni alloying elements, and the former was achieved via bactericidal Cu ions released from steel. While for the HSLA steel with high Ni content, the formation of nickel oxides including NiFe2O4 and Ni (OH)(2) refined the grains of corrosion products and decreased the bacterial attachment. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据