4.7 Article

The impact of Zika virus exposure on the placental proteomic profile

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2021.166270

关键词

Zika virus; Placenta; Proteomics; Cell death; Chorionic villi; Antibody-mediated infection

资金

  1. FAPESP [2018/18257-1, 2018/155491, 2020/04923-0]
  2. CNPq (Scientific Productivity Fellowship)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study utilized quantitative proteomics analysis to investigate the impact of ZIKV infection on placental cells, revealing altered levels of proteins involved in cell proliferation, apoptosis, and inflammatory processes. The findings suggest that antibody-opsonized ZIKV particles may play a pivotal role in determining infection outcomes and the role of mixed infections, providing valuable insights for infection control strategies.
Zika virus (ZIKV) infection has caused severe unexpected clinical outcomes in neonates and adults during the recent outbreak in Latin America, particularly in Brazil. Congenital malformations associated with ZIKV have been frequently reported; nevertheless, the mechanism of vertical transmission and the involvement of placental cells remains unclear. In this study, we applied quantitative proteomics analysis in a floating explant model of chorionic villi of human placental tissues incubated with ZIKV and with ZIKV pre-adsorbed with anti-ZIKV envelope protein. Proteomic data are available via ProteomeXchange with PXD025764 identifier Altered levels of proteins were involved in cell proliferation, apoptosis, inflammatory processes, and the integrin-cytoskeleton complex. Antibody-opsonized ZIKV particles differentially modulated the pattern of protein expression in placental cells; this phenomenon may play a pivotal role in determining the course of infection and the role of mixed infections. The expression of specific proteins was also evaluated by immunoperoxidase assays. These data fill gaps in our understanding of early events after ZIKV placental exposure and help identify infection control targets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据