4.5 Article

Large conformational dynamics in Band 3 protein: Significance for erythrocyte senescence signalling

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2021.183678

关键词

Band 3; Senescence; Erythrocyte; Conformational change

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council-supported International Research Training Group in Membrane Biology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Band 3, the predominant protein in erythrocyte membranes, undergoes significant conformational dynamics between intracellular and extracellular regions, potentially playing a crucial role in erythrocyte aging.
Band 3 (Anion Exchanger 1, AE1), the predominant protein of erythrocyte membranes, facilitates Cl-/HCO3- exchange and anchors the plasma membrane to the cytoskeleton. The Band 3 crystal structure revealed the amino acid 812-830 region as intracellular, conflicting with protein chemical data that suggested extracellular disposition. Further, circulating senescent cell auto-antibody that cannot enter erythrocytes, binds two regions of Band 3: residues 538-554 and 812-830. To reconcile this discrepancy, we assessed localization of residues 812-830 with Band 3 expressed in HEK293 cells and human erythrocytes, using chemical labeling probes and an antibody against residues 812-830. Antibody and chemical probes revealed reorientation of 812-830 region between extracellular and intracellular. This dramatic conformational change is an intrinsic property of the Band 3 molecule, occurring when expressed in HEK293 cells and without the damage that occurs during erythrocyte circulation. Conditions used to crystallize Band 3 for structural determination did not alter conformational dynamics. Collectively, these data reveal large Band 3 conformational dynamics localized to a region previously identified as an erythrocyte senescence epitope. Surface exposure of the senescence epitope (812-830), limited by conformational dynamics, may act as the molecular clock in erythrocyte senescence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据