4.6 Article

New insight into the codon usage and medium optimization toward stable and high-level 5-aminolevulinic acid production in Escherichia coli

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 177, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2021.108259

关键词

5-aminolevulinic acid; Codon shuffling; Chaperone; Antibiotic-free; Glucose-glycerol mixed culture

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST 108-2221-E-006-004-MY3, MOST 110-2221-E-006-030-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrated that codon adaptation index and tRNA adaptation index influence the expression level and folding of recombinant ALAS gene in E. coli. Genomic integration and co-expression of chaperone helped increase 5-ALA production in E. coli. Addition of ferric ion during continuous culture boosted cell growth and 5-ALA production.
5-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) is recently being used as a critical prodrug used for the photodynamic therapy of cancers. In this study, we first demonstrated via codon shuffling that codon adaptation index (CAI) and tRNA adaptation index (tAI) influenced the translational level and folding of the recombinant ALA synthase from Rhodobacter capsulatus (Rc*) for 5-ALA production in E. coli. A genome-based chassis Rc*GI was achieved by genomic integration and co-expression of chaperone (GroELS) with Rc*, which increased the cell growth of E. coli and 5-ALA production (up to 5.9 g/L) in antibiotic-free culture. However, the homocysteine methyltransferase (metE) and ferrienterobactin receptor (fepA), both ferric dependent and heme related proteins were stimulated after continuous culture for 7 batches, thus the addition of ferric ion into the culture boosted the cell growth and 5-ALA production. Finally, the glucose-glycerol mixed carbon source was employed to extend cell growth and the highest 5-ALA titer of 15.6 g/L was achieved via fed-batch fermentation. We provide new insights into the economical and efficient bioprocessing of 5-ALA production with a robust chassis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据