4.6 Article

MicroRNA-199b-3p suppresses malignant proliferation by targeting Phospholipase Cε and correlated with poor prognosis in prostate cancer

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.08.078

关键词

microRNA-199b-3p; Phospholipase C epsilon; Prostate cancer; Malignant proliferation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81802543]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

miR-199b-3p expression is significantly lower in PCa compared to benign prostatic hyperplasia, and is associated with poor prognosis. It can inhibit the malignant proliferation of PCa cells by down-regulating PLC epsilon.
Objectives: MicroRNA-199b-3p (miR-199b-3p) plays a crucial role in the malignant development of various cancers, but little known in prostate cancer (PCa). The aim of our study was to demonstrate the function of miR-199b-3p in PCa. Methods: Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was used to detect miR-199b-3p expression in PCa and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) tissue samples. In addition, we examined the relationship between the poor prognosis in PCa and miR-199b-3p. Western blot was used to analyze the expression of Phospholipase C epsilon (PLC epsilon). CCK8 and colony-forming assays were applied to detect the proliferation of PCa. EdU assay is used to detect PCa cells uptake of EdU. Luciferase reporter assay was applied to analyze the binding between miR-199b-3p and PLC epsilon. Results: It has been shown that miR-199b-3p in PCa was significantly lower than that in benign prostatic hyperplasia and correlated with poor prognosis. Meanwhile, upregulation of miR-199b-3p can prominently inhibit the proliferation of PCa cells, while its down-regulation triggered opposite result. PLC epsilon was identified as the downstream binding target gene and negatively associated with that of miR-199b-3p. Conclusion: miR-199b-3p suppresses malignant proliferation by inhibiting PLC epsilon in prostate cancer in vitro and vivo. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据