4.6 Article

Role of clusterin in the regulation of trophoblast development and preeclampsia

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.10.064

关键词

Clusterin; Preeclampsia; Epithelial-mesenchymal transition; Invasion

资金

  1. National Natural Science Fund of China [81871716]
  2. Science and Technology project Fund of Guangzhou [20191A011035]
  3. Natural Science Fund of Guangdong Province [2018A0303130314]
  4. Guangzhou Institute of Pediatrics/Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center [IP-2019-009]
  5. Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center [CWCMC2020-6-017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the expression of CLU is increased before the onset of PE and is positively correlated with the severity of the condition. CLU can inhibit the epithelial-mesenchymal transition of trophoblast cells, thereby reducing cell migration and invasion.
Preeclampsia (PE) threatens the safety of mothers and fetuses, and its pathogenesis is still unclear. Our previous study has found the relationship between PE and serum Clusterin (CLU). This study aimed to investigate the role of CLU on PE. Firstly, levels of CLU in serum and placental tissue from PE patients and healthy pregnancies were compared. Then, RNA sequencing, cell counting kit-8, matrigel invasion, cell apoptosis, and angiogenesis assay were performed to evaluate the role of CLU on primary isolation trophoblast cells. We found the expression of CLU was increased before the clinical syndrome occurred, whereas its level was positively related to the severity of PE. CLU significantly inhibited the expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and Vimentin and enhanced E-cadherin to inhibit epithelial-mesenchymal transition of trophoblast cells, further reducing its migration and invasion. Our results suggested that CLU may play a role in regulating trophoblast invasion and migration during placental development, which may be one of the risk factors for PE. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据