4.6 Article

Structural basis for the substrate recognition mechanism of ATP-sulfurylase domain of human PAPS synthase 2

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.11.062

关键词

Sulfation; Human PAPS synthase; 3 '-phosphoadenosine-5 '-phosphosulfate; 5 '-phosphosulfate

资金

  1. Major Research plan of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [91853118]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22107067, 22077081, 21722802]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science foundation [2020M681342]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reported the structures of the ATP-sulfurylase domain of PAPSS2 and its complex with APS, revealing the unique mechanism ATPS2 uses for substrate recognition and binding. This discovery provides important information for a better understanding of the biological function of PAPSS2 in tumorigenesis.
Sulfation is an essential modification on biomolecules in living cells, and 3'-Phosphoadenosine-5'-phosphosulfate (PAPS) is its unique and universal sulfate donor. Human PAPS synthases (PAPSS1 and 2) are the only enzymes that catalyze PAPS production from inorganic sulfate. Unexpectedly, PAPSS1 and PAPSS2 do not functional complement with each other, and abnormal function of PAPSS2 but not PAPSS1 leads to numerous human diseases including bone development diseases, hormone disorder and cancers. Here, we reported the crystal structures of ATP-sulfurylase domain of human PAPSS2 (ATPS2) and ATPS2 in complex with is product 5'-phosphosulfate (APS). We demonstrated that ATPS2 recognizes the substrates by using family conserved residues located on the HXXH and PP motifs, and achieves substrate binding and releasing by employing a non-conserved phenylalanine (Phe550) through a never observed flipping mechanism. Our discovery provides additional information to better understand the biological function of PAPSS2 especially in tumorigenesis, and may facilitate the drug discovery against this enzyme. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据