期刊
BEHAVIOR GENETICS
卷 52, 期 1, 页码 1-12出版社
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10519-021-10085-5
关键词
Polygenic scores; Victimisation; Resilience; Depression; Wellbeing; ALSPAC
资金
- UK Medical Research Council [217065/Z/19/Z]
- Wellcome [217065/Z/19/Z]
- Elizabeth Blackwell Institute for Health Research, University of Bristol
- Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund [105612/Z/14/Z]
- Philip Leverhulme Prize
- Alan Turing Institute under the EPSRC [EP/N510129/1]
- Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) [ES/T007370/1]
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol [MC_UU_00011/7]
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at the University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
- University of Bristol [BRC-1215-2011]
- EPSRC [EP/N510129/1] Funding Source: UKRI
- ESRC [ES/T007370/1] Funding Source: UKRI
- MRC [MC_PC_19009] Funding Source: UKRI
- Wellcome Trust [105612/Z/14/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
Research shows that peer victimisation and genetic factors can independently predict depressive symptoms and wellbeing in early adulthood. However, the decrease in mental health and wellbeing following victimisation cannot be solely attributed to the moderating effect of genetic factors at present.
Previous studies suggest an individual's risk of depression following adversity may be moderated by their genetic liability. No study, however, has examined peer victimisation, an experience repeatedly associated with mental illness. We explore whether the negative mental health outcomes following victimisation can be partly attributed to genetic factors using polygenic scores for depression and wellbeing. Among participants from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), we show that polygenic scores and peer victimisation are significant independent predictors of depressive symptoms (n=2268) and wellbeing (n=2299) in early adulthood. When testing for interaction effects, our results lead us to conclude that low mental health and wellbeing following peer victimisation is unlikely to be explained by a moderating effect of genetic factors, as indexed by current polygenic scores. Genetic profiling is therefore unlikely to be effective in identifying those more vulnerable to the effects of victimisation at present. The reasons why some go on to experience mental health problems following victimisation, while others remain resilient, requires further exploration, but our results rule out a major influence of current polygenic scores.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据