4.1 Article

ASSESSMENT OF ANALGESIC, ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AND ANTI-PYRETIC ACTIVITIES OF MALVA NEGLECTA WALLR. IN ANIMAL MODEL

期刊

BANGLADESH JOURNAL OF BOTANY
卷 50, 期 3, 页码 577-583

出版社

BANGLADESH BOTANICAL SOC
DOI: 10.3329/bjb.v50i3.55837

关键词

Analgesic; Anti-inflammatory; Anti-pyretic; Malva neglecta

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and antipyretic activities of Malva neglecta extracts in Swiss albino mice, demonstrating significant effects in reducing pain, inflammation, and fever in the experimental models.
Analgesic, anti-inflammatory and anti-pyretic activities of n-hexane and aqueous ethanolic extracts of Malva neglecta in Swiss albino mice was evaluated. For each activity, the mice were divided into 4 groups: Group 1 served as control, Groups 2 and 3 were given n-hexane and aqueous ethanol extracts, respectively whereas Group 4 was treated with the standard drug. Analgesic activity was evaluated against acetic acid induced writhing, Eddy's hot plate method, and Formalin induced paw licking. Anti-inflammatory activity was evaluated by carrageenan-induced paw edema. The extracts were also examined for their anti-pyretic activities against yeast-induced pyrexia. Results showed that the n-hexane (p < 0.05) and aqueous ethanolic (p < 0.005) extracts of M. neglecta exhibited analgesic activity by reducing acetic acid-induced writhing, mean reaction time on hot plate model and formalin-induced paw licking in mice as compared to the control. The n-hexane extract (p < 0.05) as well as aqueous ethanolic (p < 0.005) extracts produced significant antiinflammatory activity as compared to the control. Both the n-hexane and aqueous ethanolic extracts revealed significant antipyretic activity (p < 0.005 and p < 0.05, respectively) in mice model. The results of the present study demonstrated that the n-hexane and aqueous ethanol extracts of M. neglecta possess analgesic, antiinflammatory and anti-pyretic activities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据