4.5 Review

A systematic review on autistic people's experiences of stigma and coping strategies

期刊

AUTISM RESEARCH
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 12-26

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aur.2652

关键词

autism; coping strategies; lived experience; self-stigma; stigma; systematic review

资金

  1. University College London

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Autism is seen as a concealable stigmatized identity. Autistic individuals are aware of stereotypes and discrimination, leading to lower self-worth and mental health issues. To cope with stigma, they may use strategies like concealment, self-advocacy, and identity reconstruction, but the effectiveness of these strategies is still uncertain.
Autism can be understood as a concealable stigmatized identity. This is the first systematic review to synthesize the literature on autistic people's experiences of stigma and coping strategies. 2877 studies were screened and 27 were included in this review. The reviewed literature demonstrates that autistic individuals are acutely aware of being stereotyped, judged, and discriminated by others. Autistic people also show signs of internalizing stigma, rendering them more vulnerable to low self-worth and poorer mental health. To manage the impact of stigma, the included studies suggest that autistic individuals may use these strategies: concealment and camouflaging, selective disclosure and self-advocacy, as well as positive reframing and reconstructing identity. However, the evidence is limited and mixed in terms of how helpful and effective these strategies are. Future studies should include autistic populations with a wider range of intellectual abilities and explore interventions that can support autistic people in managing stigma to supplement interventions that seek to reduce stigma towards autistic people. The power of language in perpetuating and challenging stigma also has important implications for research and practice, underscoring the need for researchers and practitioners to reflect carefully on the messages they are communicating about autism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据