4.7 Article

Physics of Thermonuclear Explosions: Magnetic Field Effects on Deflagration Fronts and Observable Consequences

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 923, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0ef8

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [AST-1715133]
  2. NSF [ACI-1548562]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the influence of magnetic field strength and morphology on Type Ia supernovae and their late-time light curves and spectra is investigated. It is found that the topology of the magnetic field is determined by the burning process, independent of initial strength, during the early deflagration phase. Late-time spectra show the imprint of both magnetic field strength and morphology, with inferred magnetic field strengths having a lower limit of 10^6 G.
We present a study of the influence of magnetic field strength and morphology in Type Ia supernovae and their late-time light curves and spectra. In order to both capture self-consistent magnetic field topologies and evolve our models to late times, a two-stage approach is taken. We study the early deflagration phase (similar to 1 s) using a variety of magnetic field strengths and find that the topology of the field is set by the burning, independent of the initial strength. We study late-time (similar to 1000 days) light curves and spectra with a variety of magnetic field topologies and infer magnetic field strengths from observed supernovae. Lower limits are found to be 10(6) G. This is determined by the escape, or lack thereof, of positrons that are tied to the magnetic field. The first stage employs 3D MHD and a local burning approximation and uses the code Enzo. The second stage employs a hybrid approach, with 3D radiation and positron transport and spherical hydrodynamics. The second stage uses the code HYDRA. In our models, magnetic field amplification remains small during the early deflagration phase. Late-time spectra bear the imprint of both magnetic field strength and morphology. Implications for alternative explosion scenarios are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据