4.7 Article

Thermal and Nonthermal Emission in the Optical-UV Spectrum of PSR B0950+08*

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 924, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3a6f

关键词

-

资金

  1. NASA through Space Telescope Science Institute [16064]
  2. NASA [NAS 5-26555]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on recent observations, a thermal component has been revealed in the spectrum of the old pulsar B0950+08, with an estimated surface temperature of (1-3) x 10(5) K. New optical observations have shown a flatter slope of the spectrum compared to ground-based observations, with a lower temperature than previously reported but still higher than predicted.
Based on recent Hubble Space Telescope (HST) observations in the far-UV and ground-based observations in optical bands, Pavlov and colleagues have revealed a thermal component in the spectrum of the old pulsar B0950+08 (spin-down age 17.5 Myr) and estimated a neutron star (NS) surface temperature of (1-3) x 10(5) K. Our new HST observations in the optical have allowed us to resolve the pulsar from a close-by galaxy and measure the optical fluxes more accurately. Using the newly measured fluxes and a new calibration of the HST's far-UV detector, we fit the optical-UV pulsar's spectrum with a model that consists of a nonthermal power law (f ( nu ) proportional to nu ( alpha )) and thermal blackbody components. We obtained the spectral slope alpha = -0.3 +/- 0.3, considerably flatter than found from ground-based observations, and the best-fit temperature in the range of (6-12) x 10(4) K (as seen by a distant observer), depending on interstellar extinction and NS radius. The temperature is lower than reported previously, but still much higher than predicted by NS passive cooling scenarios for such an old pulsar. This means that some heating mechanisms operate in NSs, e.g., caused by the interaction of the faster-rotating neutron superfluid with the slower-rotating normal matter in the inner crust of the NS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据