4.6 Article

The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS) Optical confirmation, redshifts, and properties of the cluster and group catalog

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 661, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141123

关键词

catalogs; galaxies: clusters: general; galaxies: distances and redshifts; galaxies: clusters: intracluster medium; X-rays: galaxies: clusters

资金

  1. Russian Space Agency (Roskosmos)
  2. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics (Milt:)
  3. DLR
  4. Max Planck Society
  5. Japanese Cabinet Office
  6. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)
  7. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  8. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  9. Toray Science Foundation
  10. NAOJ
  11. Kavli IPMC
  12. KEK
  13. ASIAA
  14. Princeton University
  15. World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI Initiative), MEXT, Japan
  16. JSPS KAKENHI [JP18K03693, JP19KK0076]
  17. Excellence Cluster ORIGINS
  18. Max Planck Society Faculty Fellowship program
  19. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet
  20. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NNX08AR22G]
  21. National Science Foundation [AST-1238877]
  22. U.S. Department of Energy
  23. U.S. National Science Foundation
  24. Ministry of Science and Education of Spain
  25. Science and Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom
  26. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  27. National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  28. Kavli Institute of Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago
  29. Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics at the Ohio State University
  30. Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy at Texas AM University
  31. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos
  32. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo
  33. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  34. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  35. Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Inovacao
  36. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  37. Argonne National Laboratory
  38. University of California at Santa Cruz
  39. University of Cambridge
  40. Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas, Medioambientales y Tecnologicas-Madrid
  41. University of Chicago
  42. University College London
  43. DES -Brazil Consortium
  44. University of Edinburgh
  45. Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zurich
  46. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
  47. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  48. Institut de Ciencies de l'Espai (IEEC/CSIC)
  49. Institut de Fisica d'Altes Energies
  50. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  51. Ludwig Maximilians Universitat Munchen
  52. associated Excellence Cluster Universe
  53. University of Michigan
  54. NSF's NOIRLab
  55. University of Nottingham
  56. Ohio State University
  57. University of Pennsylvania
  58. University of Portsmouth
  59. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University
  60. University of Sussex
  61. Texas AM University
  62. National Astronomical Observatories of China
  63. Chinese Academy of Sciences (the Strategic Priority Research Program The Emergence of Cosmological Structures Grant) [XDB09000000]
  64. Special Fund for Astronomy from the Ministry of Finance
  65. External Cooperation Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [114A11KYSB20160057]
  66. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation [11433005]
  67. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  68. Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-ACO2-05CH1123]
  69. National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, a DOE Office of Science User Facility [DE-ACO2-05CH1123]
  70. U.S. National Science Foundation, Division of Astronomical Sciences [AST-0950945]
  71. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy [EXC-2094 -390783311]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A catalog of 542 X-ray selected galaxy cluster candidates was compiled and optical follow-up was conducted to provide redshifts and cluster confirmation. Through the use of optical imaging data and tools such as multi-component matched filter, 477 optically confirmed clusters and groups were successfully identified with a residual contamination of 6%.
Context. In 2019, the eROSITA telescope on board the Russian-German satellite Spectrum-Roentgen-Gamma (SRG) began to perform a deep all-sky X-ray survey with the aim of identifying similar to 100 000 clusters and groups over the course of four years. As part of its performance verification phase, a similar to 140 deg(2) survey, called eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS), was performed. With a depth typical of the all-sky survey after four years, it allows tests of tools and methods as well as improved predictions for the all-sky survey. Aims. As part of this effort, a catalog of 542 X-ray selected galaxy group and cluster candidates was compiled. In this paper we present the optical follow-up, with the aim of providing redshifts and cluster confirmation for the full sample. Furthermore, we aim to provide additional information on the dynamical state, richness, and optical center of the clusters. Finally, we aim to evaluate the impact of optical cluster confirmation on the purity and completeness of the X-ray selected sample. Methods. We used optical imaging data from the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program and from the Legacy Survey to identify optical counterparts to the X-ray detected cluster candidates. We make use of the multi-component matched filter cluster confirmation tool (MCMF), as well as of the optical cluster finder CAMIRA to derive cluster redshifts and richnesses. MCMF provided the probabilities with which an optical structure would be a chance superposition with the X-ray candidate. These probabilities were used to identify the best optical counterpart as well as to confirm an X-ray candidate as a cluster. The impact of this confirmation process on catalog purity and completeness was estimated using optical to X-ray scaling relations as well as simulations. The resulting catalog was furthermore matched with public group and cluster catalogs. Optical estimators of the cluster dynamical state were constructed based on density maps of the red-sequence galaxies at the cluster redshift. Results. By providing redshift estimates for all 542 candidates, we construct an optically confirmed sample of 477 clusters and groups with a residual contamination of 6%. Of these, 470 (98.5%) are confirmed using MCMF, and 7 systems are added through cross-matching with spectroscopic group catalogs. Using observable-to-observable scaling and the applied confirmation threshold, we predict that 8 +/- 2 real systems have been excluded with the MCMF cut required to build this low-contamination sample. This number agrees well with the 7 systems found through cross-matching that were not confirmed with MCMF. The predicted redshift and mass distribution of this catalog agree well with simulations. Thus, we expect that these 477 systems include >99% of all true clusters in the candidate list. Using an MCMF-independent method, we confirm that the catalog contamination of the confirmed subsample is 6 +/- 3%. Application of the same method to the full candidate list yields 17 +/- 3%, consistent with estimates coming from the fraction of confirmed systems of similar to 17% and with expectations from simulations of similar to 20%. We also present a sample of merging cluster candidates based on the derived estimators of the cluster dynamical state.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据