4.6 Article

Moment expansion of polarized dust SED: A new path towards capturing the CMB B-modes with LiteBIRD

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 660, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142664

关键词

cosmic background radiation; inflation; cosmology; observations; dust; extinction

资金

  1. ISAS/JAXA
  2. JAXA research and development directorate
  3. World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI) of MEXT
  4. JSPS Core-to-Core Program of A. Advanced Research Networks
  5. JSPS KAKENHI [JP15H05891, JP17H01115, JP17H01125]
  6. Italian Space Agency (ASI) [2020-9-HH.0, 2016-24-H.1-2018]
  7. National Institute for Nuclear Physics (INFN)
  8. National Institute for Astrophysics (INAF)
  9. Centre National d'Etudes Spatiale (CNES)
  10. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  11. Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique (CEA)
  12. Canadian Space Agency
  13. NASA [80NSSC18K0132]
  14. Research Council of Norway [263011]
  15. Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigacion (AEI) [PID2019-110610RB-C21, AYA2017-84185-P]
  16. Swedish National Space Agency (SNSA/Rymdstyrelsen)
  17. Swedish Research Council [2019-03959]
  18. Excellence Cluster ORIGINS - Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy [EXC-2094 - 390783311]
  19. Office of Science of the US Department of Energy
  20. ERC under the European Union [725456]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate characterization of polarized dust emission is crucial for the study of the cosmic microwave background primordial B-modes. Future surveys need to consider the spectral variations of dust and use innovative parameterization methods to avoid biases in the analysis. This paper applies a moment expansion of the dust spectral energy distribution and introduces the expansion of the cross-angular power spectra in both spectral index and temperature, achieving an unbiased measurement of the tensor-to-scalar ratio.
Accurate characterization of the polarized dust emission from our Galaxy will be decisive in the quest for the cosmic microwave background (CMB) primordial B-modes. An incomplete modeling of its potentially complex spectral properties could lead to biases in the CMB polarization analyses and to a spurious measurement of the tensor-to-scalar ratio r. It is particularly crucial for future surveys like the LiteBIRD satellite, the goal of which is to constrain the faint primordial signal leftover by inflation with an accuracy on the tensor-to-scalar ratio r of the order of 10(-3). Variations of the dust properties along and between lines of sight lead to unavoidable distortions of the spectral energy distribution (SED) that cannot be easily anticipated by standard component-separation methods. This issue can be tackled using a moment expansion of the dust SED, an innovative parametrization method imposing minimal assumptions on the sky complexity. In the present paper, we apply this formalism to the B-mode cross-angular power spectra computed from simulated LiteBIRD polarization data at frequencies between 100 and 402 GHz that contain CMB, dust, and instrumental noise. The spatial variation of the dust spectral parameters (spectral index beta and temperature T) in our simulations lead to significant biases on r (similar to 21 sigma(r)) if not properly taken into account. Performing the moment expansion in beta, as in previous studies, reduces the bias but does not lead to sufficiently reliable estimates of r. We introduce, for the first time, the expansion of the cross-angular power spectra SED in both beta and T, showing that, at the sensitivity of LiteBIRD, the SED complexity due to temperature variations needs to be taken into account in order to prevent analysis biases on r. Thanks to this expansion, and despite the existing correlations between some of the dust moments and the CMB signal responsible for a rise in the error on r, we can measure an unbiased value of the tensor-to-scalar ratio with a dispersion as low as sigma(r)& x2004;=& x2004;8.8 x 10(-4).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据