4.6 Article

A Transiting, Temperate Mini-Neptune Orbiting the M Dwarf TOI-1759 Unveiled by TESS

期刊

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
卷 163, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac4af0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (MPG)
  2. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC)
  3. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO)
  4. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) [FICTS-2011-02, ICTS-2017-07-CAHA-4, CAHA16-CE-3978]
  5. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astronomie
  6. Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucia
  7. Landessternwarte Konigstuhl
  8. Institut de Ciencies de l'Espai
  9. Institut furAstrophysik Gottingen
  10. Universidad Complutense de Madrid
  11. Thuringer Landessternwarte Tautenburg
  12. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  13. Hamburger Sternwarte
  14. Centro de Astrobiologia
  15. Centro Astronomico Hispano-Aleman
  16. MINECO
  17. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through the Major Research Instrumentation Programme
  18. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [FOR2544]
  19. Klaus Tschira Stiftung
  20. state of BadenWurttemberg
  21. state of Niedersachsen
  22. Junta de Andalucia
  23. Agencia Estatal de Investigacion of the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades
  24. ERDF [PID2019-109522GB-C5[1:4], PGC2018-098153-B-C33, AYA2018-84089, PID2019-107061GB-C64, PID2019110689RB-100, AYA2016-79425-C3-1/2/3-P, BES2017-080769]
  25. Centre of Excellence Severo Ochoa award
  26. Centre of Excellence Maria de Maeztu award
  27. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias [CEX2019-000920-S]
  28. Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucia [SEV-2017-0709]
  29. Centro de Astrobiologia [MDM-2017-0737]
  30. NASA [NNX17AG24G]
  31. Generalitat de Catalunya/CERCA program
  32. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [895525]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the discovery and characterization of TOI-1759 b, a sub-Neptune-sized exoplanet with a moderate temperature orbiting the M dwarf TOI-1759. The actual period, radius, and mass of TOI-1759 b were determined through joint analysis of photometry and radial velocity measurements. This planet shows potential for transmission spectroscopy studies and is among the top exoplanets with the highest transmission spectroscopic metric (TSM) value. Additionally, two additional signals in the radial velocities indicate possible stellar activity and further investigation is needed to determine their nature.
We report the discovery and characterization of TOI-1759 b, a temperate (400 K) sub-Neptune-sized exoplanet orbiting the M dwarf TOI-1759 (TIC 408636441). TOI-1759 b was observed by TESS to transit in Sectors 16, 17, and 24, with only one transit observed per sector, creating an ambiguity regarding the orbital period of the planet candidate. Ground-based photometric observations, combined with radial-velocity measurements obtained with the CARMENES spectrograph, confirm an actual period of 18.85019 +/- 0.00014 days. A joint analysis of all available photometry and radial velocities reveals a radius of 3.17 +/- 0.10 R-circle plus and a mass of 10.8 +/- 1.5 M-circle plus. Combining this with the stellar properties derived for TOI-1759 (R-star = 0.597 +/- 0.015 R-circle dot; M-star = 0.606 +/- 0.020 M-circle dot; T (eff) = 4065 +/- 51 K), we compute a transmission spectroscopic metric (TSM) value of over 80 for the planet, making it a good target for transmission spectroscopy studies. TOI-1759 b is among the top five temperate, small exoplanets (T-eq < 500 K, R-p < 4 R-circle plus) with the highest TSM discovered to date. Two additional signals with periods of 80 days and >200 days seem to be present in our radial velocities. While our data suggest both could arise from stellar activity, the later signal's source and periodicity are hard to pinpoint given the similar to 200 days baseline of our radial-velocity campaign with CARMENES. Longer baseline radial-velocity campaigns should be performed in order to unveil the true nature of this long-period signal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据