4.6 Article

Final Targeting Strategy for the Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment 2 North Survey

期刊

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
卷 162, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac260c

关键词

-

资金

  1. NASA - Space Telescope Science Institute [51386.01, NAS 5-26555]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [AST-1449476]
  3. NSF [AST-1616636, AST-1909497, AST-1203017, AST-1911129, AST-1715898]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [670519]
  5. KU Leuven Research Council [C16/18/005]
  6. BELgian federal Science Policy Office (BELSPO) through PRODEX grant PLATO
  7. National Science Foundation REU program [AST-1311835, AST-1715662, PHY-1358770, PHY-1659444]
  8. Chilean Centro de Excelencia en Astrofisica y Tecnologias Afines (CATA) BASAL [AFB-170002]
  9. Direccion de Investigacion y Desarrollo de la Universidad de La Serena through the Programa de Incentivo a la Investigacion de Academicos (PIA-DIDULS)
  10. NSF Astronomy and Astrophysics Postdoctoral Fellowship [AST-1801940]
  11. State Research Agency (AEI) of the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (MCIU)
  12. European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) [AYA2017-88254-P]
  13. Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica (CONICYT) through the FONDECYT [1170476]
  14. QUIMAL project [130001]
  15. CONICYT [AFB-170002]
  16. Fondecyt Regular [1180350]
  17. Chilean Centro de Excelencia en Astrofisica y Tecnologias Afines (CATA) [AFB-170002]
  18. CONACYT [CB2018 A1S-9754]
  19. UNAM DGAPA , Mexico [PAPIIT IN112620]
  20. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  21. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  22. Carnegie Institution for Science
  23. Chilean Participation Group
  24. French Participation Group
  25. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
  26. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  27. The Johns Hopkins University
  28. Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (IPMU)/University of Tokyo
  29. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  30. Leibniz Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP)
  31. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astronomie (MPIA Heidelberg)
  32. MaxPlanck-Institut fur Astrophysik (MPA Garching)
  33. Max-PlanckInstitut fur Extraterrestrische Physik (MPE)
  34. National Astronomical Observatories of China
  35. New Mexico State University
  36. New York University
  37. University of Notre Dame
  38. Observatario Nacional/MCTI
  39. The Ohio State University
  40. Pennsylvania State University
  41. Shanghai Astronomical Observatory,
  42. United Kingdom Participation Group
  43. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
  44. University of Arizona
  45. University of Colorado Boulder
  46. University of Oxford
  47. University of Portsmouth
  48. University of Utah
  49. University of Virginia
  50. University of Washington
  51. University of Wisconsin
  52. Vanderbilt University
  53. Yale University
  54. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  55. National Science Foundation
  56. NASA Office of Space Science [NNX13AC07G]
  57. Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Heidelberg
  58. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Garching
  59. Durham University
  60. University of Edinburgh
  61. Queen's University Belfast
  62. Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network Incorporated
  63. National Central University of Taiwan
  64. National Aeronautics and Space Administration through the Planetary Science Division of the NASA Science Mission Directorate [NNX08AR22G]
  65. National Science Foundation [AST-1238877]
  66. University of Maryland
  67. Eotvos Lorand University (ELTE)
  68. Los Alamos National Laboratory
  69. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  70. National Science Foundation AAG program
  71. Brazilian Participation Group
  72. Carnegie Mellon University
  73. NASA
  74. Near Earth Object-WISE (NEOWISE)
  75. Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA [NAS5-26555]
  76. Space Telescope Science Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper presents updates and additions to the initial targeting strategy for APOGEE-2N, with modifications made through Ancillary Science Programs and Bright Time Extension. These measures allowed changes to the main survey strategy, inclusion of new programs in response to scientific discoveries, and expansions of existing programs for enhanced scientific success.
The Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment 2 (APOGEE-2) is a dual-hemisphere, near-infrared (NIR), spectroscopic survey with the goal of producing a chemodynamical mapping of the Milky Way. The targeting for APOGEE-2 is complex and has evolved with time. In this paper, we present the updates and additions to the initial targeting strategy for APOGEE-2N presented in Zasowski et al. (2017). These modifications come in two implementation modes: (i) Ancillary Science Programs competitively awarded to Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV PIs through proposal calls in 2015 and 2017 for the pursuit of new scientific avenues outside the main survey, and (ii) an effective 1.5 yr expansion of the survey, known as the Bright Time Extension (BTX), made possible through accrued efficiency gains over the first years of the APOGEE-2N project. For the 23 distinct ancillary programs, we provide descriptions of the scientific aims, target selection, and how to identify these targets within the APOGEE-2 sample. The BTX permitted changes to the main survey strategy, the inclusion of new programs in response to scientific discoveries or to exploit major new data sets not available at the outset of the survey design, and expansions of existing programs to enhance their scientific success and reach. After describing the motivations, implementation, and assessment of these programs, we also leave a summary of lessons learned from nearly a decade of APOGEE-1 and APOGEE-2 survey operations. A companion paper, F. Santana et al. (submitted; AAS29036), provides a complementary presentation of targeting modifications relevant to APOGEE-2 operations in the Southern Hemisphere.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据