4.7 Article

Energy-Efficient Power Allocation in Cognitive Radio Systems With Imperfect Spectrum Sensing

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSAC.2016.2621399

关键词

Dinkelbach's method; energy efficiency; imperfect/perfect/statistical CSI; imperfect spectrum sensing; interference power constraint; power allocation; probability of detection; probability of false alarm; transmit power constraint

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CNS-1443966, ECCS-1443994, CCF-1618615]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys [1509006] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper studies energy-efficient power allocation schemes for secondary users in sensing-based spectrum sharing cognitive radio systems. It is assumed that secondary users first perform channel sensing possibly with errors and then initiate data transmission with different power levels based on sensing decisions. In this setting, the optimization problem is to maximize energy efficiency (EE) subject to peak/average transmission power constraints and peak/average interference constraints. By exploiting the quasi-concave property of the EE maximization problem, the original problem is transformed into an equivalent parameterized concave problem, and an iterative power allocation algorithm based on Dinkelbach's method is proposed. The optimal power levels are identified in the presence of different levels of channel side information (CSI) regarding the transmission and interference links at the secondary transmitter, namely, perfect CSI of both transmission and interference links, perfect CSI of the transmission link, imperfect CSI of the interference link, imperfect CSI of both links, or only statistical CSI of both links. Through numerical results, the impact of sensing performance, different types of CSI availability, and transmit and interference power constraints on the EE of the secondary users is analyzed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据