4.5 Article

Effect of stocking density on growth of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) cultured in containers in a land-based recirculating aquaculture system (C-RAS)

期刊

AQUACULTURE RESEARCH
卷 53, 期 4, 页码 1518-1526

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/are.15686

关键词

container; growth; Micropterus salmoides; recirculating aquaculture system; stocking density

资金

  1. Henan Innovative Science and Technology Team Support Plan [CXTD2016043]
  2. Key disciplines of Fisheries in Henan Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that largemouth bass grew fastest at a density of 50 fish/m(3) in a land-based recirculating aquaculture system, with a power function relationship between body length and body weight. These results provide important reference for aquaculture using the C-RAS system.
To study the effect of different stocking densities on the growth of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) cultured in containers in a land-based recirculating aquaculture system (C-RAS), 13,500 fish with initial average body mass of 137.3 +/- 5.46 g were selected and stocked at 1000 fish/container (group 50 fish/m(3)), 1500 fish/container (group 75 fish/m(3)) or 2000 fish/container (group 100 fish/m(3)), with three replicates for each group. Thirty fish were randomly collected from each container on Days 30, 60 and 90 for measurement and analysis. The final body mass, body mass gain rate, daily body mass gain, final body length, body length growth rate and daily body length growth in group 50 fish/m(3) were significantly higher than those in groups 75 fish/m(3) and 100 fish/m(3) (p < 0.05). The relationship between body mass and body length followed a power function, with R-2 values of 0.9968, 0.9896 and 0.9902 respectively. Based on our comprehensive analysis, the largemouth bass in this study grew fastest at the density of 50 fish/m(3). As the first study of the effect of stocking density on growth of largemouth bass in a C-RAS, these results provide a reference for aquaculture using the relatively new C-RAS system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据