4.7 Article

Combined effect of florfenicol with linalool via bath in combating Aeromonas hydrophila infection in silver catfish (Rhamdia quelen)

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 545, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737247

关键词

Aeromonosis; Evaporative loss; Histopathology; Oxidative stress; Survival curve

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) of Brazil [001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combination of florfenicol with linalool via bath showed promising results in treating aeromonosis in silver catfish, reducing oxidative stress and histological changes.
The phytochemical linalool has synergistic activity with florfenicol against Aeromonas hydrophila in an in vitro study. However, there is a lack of in vivo studies to confirm this finding. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the in vivo effect of the combination of florfenicol with linalool via bath against aeromonosis in silver catfish (Rhamdia quelen) and their responses in redox balance and histology of gills, liver, and caudal kidney. In a previous test, a survival curve of silver catfish infected with A. hydrophila and treated with different concentrations of florfenicol via bath was performed. Florfenicol via bath at low concentration (12 mg/L) was able to increase the survival of infected fish. In the main test, the combined effect of florfenicol with linalool was evaluated. Bath with both substances decreased thiobarbituric acid reactive substances - TBARS levels and prevented histological alterations in gills and liver of infected fish. However, the use of these substances via bath was not able to modify the changes observed in other parameters related to the redox balance of infected fish. There was still a satisfactory concentration of linalool 1 d after the bath. In general, the use of florfenicol with linalool would be an appropriate combination for treatment of fish aeromonosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据