4.7 Review

A comprehensive review of micro-scale expanders for carbon dioxide related power and refrigeration cycles

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 201, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117722

关键词

Turbine; Volumetric expander; Supercritial CO2 cycle; Transcritical CO2 cycle

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, carbon dioxide cycles have shown high efficiency and compact structure, with various types of expanders being evaluated for their performance in micro-scale applications. Volumetric expanders are found to have certain advantages due to suitable rotational speed and potential leakage reduction, but both internal and external leakages remain a significant challenge that needs urgent attention.
In recent decades, the carbon dioxide cycles, including supercritical carbon dioxide cycle, transcritical carbon dioxide Rankine cycle and refrigeration cycle, have been proven effective due to the high efficiency and compact structure, and received increasing interests. The performance of the expander in the power cycles, particularly in micro-scale applications, is one of the essential components that determine the cycle performance and still re-mains a significant challenge. This paper presents a critical overview of micro-scale (<200 kW) expanders for carbon dioxide cycles. Five types of expanders, including axial and radial turbines (dynamic expanders), scroll, piston and vane expanders (volumetric expanders), are evaluated from experimental and numerical aspects. Expansion mechanisms, rotational speed, isentropic efficiency, pressure ratio and mass flow rate are considered. The review suggests that the volumetric expanders stand certain advantages in the micro-scale carbon dioxide cycles due to the more suitable rotational speed and potentially less leakage. For all expanders, internal and external leakages remain a vital challenge that greatly reduce their performance and efficiency, which urgently needs to be addressed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据