4.7 Article

Incremental thermo-electric CFD modeling of a high-energy Lithium-Titanate Oxide battery cell in different temperatures: A comparative study

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 197, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117260

关键词

Battery; Thermal management; CFD; Equivalent circuit; Internal resistance; Mathematical model; Lithium-ion; LTO

资金

  1. Business Finland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article compares four thermo-electric CFD models for battery thermal analysis and finds that a simple constant internal resistance heat generation model is remarkably close in accuracy to the more tedious dynamic equivalent circuit model for purely thermal considerations. Although the study focuses only on discharging, the methods and models can also be used in charging situations in the future.
In this article, we address the following question: Which of the many CFD models should a designer use for battery thermal analysis? We present a comparative study of four thermo-electric CFD models for a novel highenergy Lithium-Titanate Oxide (LTO) cell to be used in an electric rallycross car prototype. In contrast to many related articles, the data required and the process of parameter identification are described in detail for each of the models, and we also address different operating temperatures. Moreover, the models' relative performance in predicting cell behavior in constant current and varying current discharge situations is addressed by comparisons to cycling measurements and thermal camera imaging. The one key insight of this analysis is that, for purely thermal considerations, the accuracy of a simple constant internal resistance based heat generation model is remarkably close to a dynamic equivalent circuit model, which is considerably more tedious to identify. A limitation of this work is that we focus only on discharging, but the methods and models can also be used in charging situations in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据