4.7 Article

A comparative study of pool boiling heat transfer in different porous artery structures

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 202, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117759

关键词

Pool boiling; Porous structure; Critical heat flux; Heat transfer coefficient; Phase separation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51876006, 51776012, 51906010]
  2. Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission, and Integrated Projects utilizing the Space Environment on ISS
  3. CMSA
  4. ESA [TGMTYY00-RW-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experimental validation shows that the novel porous artery structure can significantly enhance the pool boiling heat transfer performance, with increased nucleation site density, improved liquid replenishment by capillarity, and effective liquid/vapor phase separation being the main reasons.
A novel porous artery structure is proposed and experimentally validated to enhance the pool boiling heat transfer performance based on the concept of phase separation and modulation. In the experiment, multiple rectangular arteries are formed in the bottom of a porous structure, and a thin copper microporous layer is placed between the heating surface and the rectangular arteries. Compared with conventional porous structures, this novel porous artery structure can effectively improve the pool boiling heat transfer performance due to i) increased nucleation site density, ii) improved liquid replenishment by capillarity, and iii) effective liquid/vapor phase separation. Experimental results show that comparing with boiling heat transfer on a plain surface, a 200% higher in CHF, and a 144% higher in heat transfer coefficient (HTC), together with a 59% lower in superheat at the onset of nucleate boiling (ONB) are obtained for this new structure. In addition, the effects of the top and bottom microporous layer thickness and the artery depth on the pool boiling heat transfer performance are investigated, and the inherent physical mechanisms are analyzed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据