4.7 Article

Microplasma-assisted synthesis of TiO2-Au hybrid nanoparticles and their photocatalytic mechanism for degradation of methylene blue dye under ultraviolet and visible light irradiation

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 573, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151383

关键词

Microplasma; Plasmonic photocatalyst; TiO2-Au hybrid nanoparticles; Methylene blue; Photocatalytic degradation; Remote oxidation

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - MSIT of Korea government [NRF2021R1A2C1008787]
  2. GIST Research Institute (GRI) - GIST

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plasmonic photocatalysts consisting of TiO2 and Au nanoparticles show enhanced photocatalytic activity for degrading organic dyes under UV and visible light. Mechanism studies reveal that the contribution of hole oxidation and electron reduction pathways for dye degradation differs depending on the wavelength of irradiating light.
Plasmonic photocatalysts consisting of TiO2 and Au nanoparticles (NPs) have recently been intensively studied to overcome the limited photocatalytic activity of pristine TiO2 NPs. Here, we synthesized TiO2-Au hybrid NPs using atmospheric micmplasma-liquid interaction and demonstrated their enhanced photocatalytic activity, under both ultraviolet (UV) and visible light irradiation, for the degradation of the organic dyes methylene blue (MB) in water. Through mechanism studies using a hole scavenger and external source of hydroxyl radicals, it was also revealed that the contribution of hole oxidation and electron reduction pathways for degradation of MB via hydroxyl radicals by the TiO2-Au hybrid NPs differed depending on the wavelength of irradiating light. This is because the MB dye is likely remotely oxidized under UV irradiation, but not under visible light. This systematic study on the role of hole and electron pathways for photocatalytic dye degradation by TiO2-Au hybrid NPs at different light and pH conditions is helpful for understanding and developing plasmonic photocatalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据