4.7 Article

Fabrication of high loading V2O5/TiO2 catalysts derived from metal-organic framework with excellent activity for chlorobenzene decomposition

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 572, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151511

关键词

V2O5/TiO2 catalysts; MIL-125(Ti); High vanadium loading; Chlorobenzene; In situ DRIFTS

资金

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program (A) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA23030300]
  2. Cultivating Project of Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDPB19]
  3. Fund of State Key Laboratory of Multi-phase Complex Systems [MPCS-2021-A-01]
  4. Young Talent Project of the Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, CAS [CERAE201805]
  5. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the catalytic combustion of 100 ppm chlorobenzene over V2O5/TiO2 catalysts with high vanadium loading, and found that VOx species showed 100% conversion of chlorobenzene at 250 degrees C. Various techniques including XRD, SEM, TEM, ICP-OES, N-2 adsorption-desorption, Raman, NH3-TPD, H-2-TPR, and in situ DRIFTS were used to characterize the catalysts and propose a reaction mechanism.
A series of V2O5/TiO2 catalysts with high vanadium loading (6.0 - 43.9 wt%) were prepared by wet impregnation over metal-organic framework (MOF) MIL-125(Ti) support following calcination, and were tested for catalytic combustion of 100 ppm chlorobenzene. Taking advantage of MIL-125(Ti) with high surface area, copious catalytically active VOx species generated in the case of high vanadium loading, among which 0.4VTi, 0.6VTi and 0.8VTi showed 100% chlorobenzene conversion at 250 degrees C. The effect of vanadium loading on the catalysts have been characterized by means of XRD, SEM, TEM, ICP-OES, N-2 adsorption-desorption at 77 K, Raman, NH3-TPD and H-2-TPR. The reaction mechanism of chlorobenzene over the as-prepared catalysts was also proposed by in situ DRIFTS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据