4.7 Article

Poly(vinylidene fluoride)-based film with strong antimicrobial activity

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 562, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150181

关键词

Poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF); Poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-chlorotrifluoroethylene) (PVDF-CTFE); Graft copolymer; Antimicrobial activity; Polymer blends; Biocompatibility

资金

  1. Korea Environment Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) through its Ecological Imitationbased Environmental Pollution Management Technology Development Project
  2. Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) [2019002790001]
  3. Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology (KRICT) [BSF20-253]
  4. Ministry of Science and ICT of Korea
  5. POSTECH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antimicrobial PVDF-based polymers were prepared by grafting quaternary ammonium or quaternary pyridinium monomers to effectively kill bacteria and yeast. Adding these polymers to PVDF films through blending method enhanced both mechanical properties and antimicrobial performances, while maintaining biocompatibility.
Poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) and its copolymers have been extensively utilized owing to their fascinating properties such as thermal stability, chemical resistance, and mechanical robustness. However, their lack of microbial resistance is considered a drawback that limits their adoption as biomedical materials. In this study, to overcome this problem, PVDF-based antimicrobial polymers were prepared by grafting quaternary ammonium or quaternary pyridinium monomers. The polymers could effectively kill gram-positive S. aureus, gram-negative E. coli, and the pathogenic yeast C. albicans (antimicrobial rates > 99.99%). Using the polymer blending method, 1 wt% or 5 wt% of the polymers were added to the pristine PVDF film to provide antimicrobial properties. The blend films exhibited enhanced mechanical properties compared to those of pristine PVDF and notably higher antimicrobial performances (>99% for Blend-Q4VP-5); moreover, they were all biocompatible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据