4.7 Article

Quality assessment of GaN epitaxial films: Acidification scenarios based on XPS-and-DFT combined study

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 563, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150308

关键词

Surface passivation; Oxidation; XPS; DFT; GaN; Defects; Epitaxial films

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [21-12-00392]
  2. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of RF [FEUZ-2020-0060, FEUZ-2020-0059]
  3. Russian Science Foundation [21-12-00392] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was used to study the electronic structure and surface states of GaN epitaxial films grown on Al2O3 and SiC substrates. After three years of storage in standard air conditions, only traces of surface oxidation were detected. First-principle modeling showed that GaN surface acidification is favorable in humid conditions, while oxidation process is slower in dry air conditions.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of electronic structure and surface states of GaN epitaxial films grown on Al2O3 and SiC substrates established the presence of only traces of surface oxidation after three years storage in standard air media conditions. No additional treatment was applied during this storage process. The slight shift (similar to 1 eV) of Valence Band (VB) spectra was found which occurs without any visible contribution of gallium oxide electronic states to the valence band area. Additionally, GaN-typical N 2s band is present in VB-spectra of studied epitaxial films what is confirming their high quality grade. First-principle modelling demonstrates favorability of GaN surface acidification because of humidity and much slower oxidation process in the dry-air conditions. Theoretical models of acidification scenarios also demonstrate that oxidation of defect-free and defective surfaces (N-vacancies) are a good leveler: electronic structures of all considered surfaces became almost identical that is in a perfect agreement with results of XPS measurements and analytics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据