4.7 Article

Pathways control in modification of solid surfaces induced by temporarily separated femtosecond laser pulses

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 566, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150611

关键词

LIPSS; Electronic excitation; TiO2; Femtosecond UV-laser irradiation

资金

  1. IESL-FORTH [002258]
  2. European Union [654148]
  3. COST Action TUMIEE
  4. COST-European Cooperation in Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the reaction control by laser light on TiO2 monocrystals, showing different surface morphologies and the crucial role of the critical temporal delay in the formation of grooves and periodic structures.
Reaction control by laser light is a unique method of the reaction dynamics mastery in the molecular chemistry. We provide evidence of phase control processing with femtosecond lasers in macroscopic solids. Rutile TiO2 monocrystals with (001) and (100) surface orientations were irradiated with repetitive pulses of femtosecond KrF laser of variable fluences and a temporal delay between two superimposed linearly polarized beams. The appearance of three types of surface morphology was thoroughly analyzed: low-spatial frequency laser-induced periodic surface structures (LSFL), grooves and unusual featureless flat area (FFA). The interaction of light with the excited surface led to the onset or suppression of the subwavelength LSFL, depending on whether the temporal delay between laser beams is larger or smaller than the critical value of -6 ps. By contrast, the suprawavelength grooves and FFA appeared at longer temporal delays. A strong decrease of the grooves onset energy was observed on the (001) oriented crystal after the delay of -8 ps; the decrease of onset energy was also observed on the (100) oriented crystal, where FFA appeared instead of grooves. The critical delay is discussed in framework of a phenomenological model describing the energy evolution of excited transient states along the reaction coordinate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据