4.7 Article

Molecular dynamics simulation of the interface properties of continuous carbon fiber/polyimide composites

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 563, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150370

关键词

Polymer-matrix composites; Fibre/matrix bond; Computational modelling; Microstructural analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22035007, 91934301, 21878298]
  2. DNL Cooper-ation Fund, CAS [DNL201902]
  3. External Cooperation Program of BIC, Chinese Academy of Sciences [122111KYSB20190032]
  4. Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Guangdong Laboratory, Shantou [1922006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used molecular dynamics simulations and theoretical calculations to show that the presence of grafted functional groups in carbon fiber/polyimide composites can greatly enhance the interfacial shear strength, which linearly increases with the number of grafted groups. It also revealed that the mechanism of interface enhancement is the synergistic effect of non-bond interactions and surface roughness.
The resin-fiber interface is pivotal to the performance of composites. Molecular dynamics simulations were used to study the relationship between interface structure and interface mechanical properties of carbon fiber/polyimide composites. The rationality of the models and the polymer consistent force field were verified by the glass transition temperature, the density of polyimide and the pull-out test. It was found that the interfacial shear strength (IFSS) with grafted functional groups was greatly intensified with the order of -C6H5 > -COOH > -CH3 > -OH > -NH2. The IFSS increased linearly with the increasing number of grafted groups. Grafted polyimide monomers can intensify interfacial performance more effectively. We also calculated the interaction energy by density functional theory method and the surface roughness to reveal the enhancement mechanism of the interface, which is the synergistic effect of the non-bond interaction and surface roughness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据