4.7 Article

In-situ liquid-phase transformation of SnS2/CNTs composite from SnO2/CNTs for high performance lithium-ion battery anode

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 566, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150645

关键词

SnS2; In-situ sulfuration; Hexagonal nanosheet; Anode; Lithium storage

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2019JQ-911, 2019JQ-916]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [5187010644]
  3. Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [2020JM-631]
  4. Young Talent fund of University Association for Science and Technology in Shaanxi, China [20200430]
  5. Undergraduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program [S202011736028]
  6. Science Foundation of the Science and Technology Bureau of xi 'an, Shanxi Province [2019217314GXRC009CG010-GXYD9.1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SnS2/CNTs composite exhibits better cycling and rate performances as an anode material for LIBs, attributed to its easier Li+ storage and transfer characteristics compared to SnO2/CNTs.
SnS2/CNTs composite with hexagonal SnS2 nanosheet growing along carbon nanotube (CNTs) by C-S bonding is synthesized via in-situ sulfuration of prefabricated SnO2/CNTs in the liquid environment. When they are used as Li ion batteries (LIBs) anode materials, the SnS2/CNTs exhibits much better cycling and rate performances than that of SnO2/CNTs. Through in-situ XRD characterization, SnS2/CNTs electrode possesses an additional Li+ intercalation reaction besides conversion and alloying/dealloying reaction in the first cycle. Further analysis by density functional theory (DFT) computations finds that hexagonal SnS2 exhibits lower Li+ adsorption energies and migration barrier than tetragonal structured SnO2, suggesting that Li+ storage and transfer in the SnS2/CNTs electrode is much easier and faster than SnO2/CNTs. As a consequence, SnS2/CNTs composite is more favorable for Li+ storage and is a promising anode material for LIBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据