4.7 Article

Graph convolutional networks for enhanced resolution 3D Electrical Capacitance Tomography image reconstruction

期刊

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
卷 110, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107608

关键词

3D capacitance tomography; Non-invasive imaging; Image reconstruction; Graph convolutional networks; Geometric deep learning

资金

  1. Smart Growth Operational Programme [POIR.04.01.02-00-0089/17-00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes using graph convolutional networks (GCN) to enhance the quality of 3D ECT images by effectively utilizing specific geometrical relationships hidden in unstructured grids, resulting in improved tomographic image quality and spatial resolution.
Three dimensional Electrical Capacitance Tomography (3D ECT) is an inexpensive tool for diagnosing non-conductive components of industrial processes. Although relatively mature, it still requires much work to improve its inverse nature of imaging capability. In particular, high resolution 3D ECT image reconstruction is very time-consuming and computationally heavy, and the best-known 3D ECT image reconstruction techniques have already reached their limits. Thus, there is a strong need to change a direction towards modern computational intelligence solutions. Therefore, this work proposes using graph convolutional networks (GCN) to raise the 3D ECT image quality. Mainly, it takes advantage of GCN's ability to effectively use specific geometrical relationships hidden in the finite modeling unstructured grids commonly used to build 3D ECT images. These relationships are first encoded by a graph representing an ECT volumetric finite element grid. A GCN is next trained in a graph-to-graph framework with pairs of graphs representing high-quality nonlinear image reconstruction results as input and a simulated phantom as output. As a result, a trained GCN model fed with lower resolution 3D ECT image enhances its quality and spatial resolution. Tomographic image quality and resolution enhancement was evaluated using normalized mean square error and Pearson correlation coefficient, which improved by 35.5% and 3.74%, respectively. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据