4.7 Article

A novel hybrid method for direction forecasting and trading of Apple Futures

期刊

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
卷 110, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107734

关键词

Apple Futures; High-frequency trading; Hybrid approach; Trading rule; Parameter optimization

资金

  1. National Social Science Foundation of China [19BGL131]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The novel hybrid method MCXGBoost-Bagging-RegPSO showed outstanding performance in forecasting the price direction of high-frequency Apple Futures and executing profitable simulation trading. It can serve as a valuable reference for both intraday traders and market regulators.
In this research, a novel hybrid method MCXGBoost-Bagging-RegPSO is proposed for direction forecasting of the high-frequency Apple Futures' price and simulation trading. First, a multi-classification method based on the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) is established for Apple Futures price direction classification, while the Regrouping Particle Swarm Optimization (RegPSO) is adopted to optimize the parameters of the movement magnitude levels, XGBoost, and the pre-designed trading rules. Next, a Bagging method is incorporated into the proposed approach to solve the overfitting problem. Then, the proposed method predicts the price movement direction and magnitude level, and a one-year high-frequency trading simulation is executed based on the price direction forecasting results. Finally, several evaluation indicators are used to assess the direction prediction and profitability performances of the proposed method. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach successfully achieved outstanding performance in terms of hit ratio, accumulated return, maximum drawdown, and return-risk ratio. As far as it is concerned, the proposed method could be considered as a useful reference for both intraday investors engaged in high-frequency trading and regulators of the Apple Futures market. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据