期刊
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
卷 110, 期 -, 页码 -出版社
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107638
关键词
Data center; Fault diagnosis; Classification; Time-series analysis; Gray-box model
资金
- Natural Sciences and En-gineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
A rapid and accurate FDD strategy for data center cooling systems is proposed, which uses data-driven fault classifiers to predict multiple simultaneous faults, and the effect of adding Gaussian white noise to training data is discussed, showing high accuracy even in low noise environments.
The failure of cooling systems in data centers (DCs) leads to higher indoor temperatures, causing crucial electronic devices to fail, and produces a significant economic loss. To circumvent this issue, fault detection and diagnosis (FDD) algorithms and associated control strategies can be applied to detect, diagnose, and isolate faults. Existing methods that apply FDD to DC cooling systems are designed to successfully overcome individually occurring faults but have difficulty in handling simultaneous faults. These methods either require expensive measurements or those made over a wide range of conditions to develop training models, which can be time-consuming and costly. We develop a rapid and accurate, single and multiple FDD strategy for a DC with a row-based cooling system using data-driven fault classifiers informed by a gray-box temperature prediction model. The gray-box model provides thermal maps of the DC airspace for single as well as a few simultaneous failure conditions, which are used as inputs for two different data-driven classifiers, CNN and RNN, to rapidly predict multiple simultaneous failures. The model is validated with testing data from an experimental DC. Also, the effect of adding Gaussian white noise to training data is discussed and observed that even with low noisy environment, the FDD strategy can diagnose multiple faults with accuracy as high as 100% while requiring relatively few simultaneous fault training data samples. Finally, the different classifiers are compared in terms of accuracy, confusion matrix, precision, recall and F1-score. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据