4.7 Article

Hierarchical forecast reconciliation with machine learning

期刊

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107756

关键词

Forecasting; Time series; Hierarchies; Non-linear coherence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the past 15 years, studies on hierarchical forecasting have shifted towards proposing linear combination approaches across multiple levels of the hierarchy, which offer improved forecasting performance and coherent reconciled forecasts. This paper introduces a novel hierarchical forecasting approach based on machine learning, allowing for non-linear combinations of base forecasts, leading to superior point forecasts compared to existing methods, especially when series in the hierarchy exhibit different patterns.
Over the last 15 years, studies on hierarchical forecasting have moved away from single-level approaches towards proposing linear combination approaches across multiple levels of the hierarchy. Such combinations offer coherent reconciled forecasts, improved forecasting performance and aligned decision-making. This paper proposes a novel hierarchical forecasting approach based on machine learning. The proposed method allows for non-linear combinations of the base forecasts, thus being more general than linear approaches. We structurally combine the objectives of improved post sample empirical forecasting accuracy and coherence. Due to its non-linear nature, our approach selectively combines the base forecasts in a direct and automated way without requiring that the complete information must be used for producing reconciled forecasts for each series and level. The proposed method is evaluated both in terms of accuracy and bias using two different data sets coming from the tourism and retail industries. Our results suggest that the proposed method gives superior point forecasts than existing approaches, especially when the series comprising the hierarchy are not characterized by the same patterns. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据