4.6 Article

Subband-resolved momentum-conserved resonant tunneling in monolayer graphene/h-BN/ABA-trilayer graphene small-twist-angle tunneling device

期刊

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
卷 120, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0080215

关键词

-

资金

  1. JST-CREST
  2. JST-Mirai
  3. JST-PRESTO Programs [JPMJCR15F3, JPMJCR20B4, JPMJMI21G9, JPMJSP2108, JPMJPR20L5]
  4. JSPS KAKENHI [JP19H02542, JP19H01820, JP20H00127, JP20H00354, JP21H05232, JP21H05233, JP21H05234, JP21K20345]
  5. Kenjiro Takayanagi Foundation
  6. Inoue Foundation for Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We demonstrate twist-controlled resonant tunneling in a monolayer graphene/hexagonal boron nitride/ABA-stacked trilayer graphene van der Waals junction. By aligning the graphene flakes with a small twist angle, resonant tunneling attributed to the conservation of momentum and energy between the two layers was observed, providing a method to determine band parameters and probe the band dispersion of different materials.
We demonstrate twist-controlled resonant tunneling in a monolayer graphene (MLG)/hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN)/ABA-stacked trilayer graphene (TLG) van der Waals (vdW) junction, in which MLG and TLG flakes are aligned with a small twist angle theta of & SIM;1.05 & DEG; between their crystallographic orientations through a thin h-BN barrier. Owing to the small interlayer twist, resonant tunneling attributed to the conservation of momentum and energy was observed between the single linear band of MLG and multiple subbands of TLG. We show that different subbands of TLG-bilayer-graphene-like subbands and a MLG-like subband-exhibit distinctly different resonant tunneling behaviors. Therefore, we demonstrate subband-resolved resonant tunneling. This technique provides a method to determine band parameters (Slonczewski-Weiss-McClure parameters) and probes the band dispersion of different two-dimensional materials by utilizing a MLG electrode. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据