4.6 Article

One-step production of 3D printed ferroelectric polymer forms using fused deposition modeling

期刊

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
卷 119, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0070365

关键词

-

资金

  1. Russian Academy of Sciences [AAAA-A19-119110690036-9]
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) [20-03-00171]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the possibility of 3D printing polymer forms with a ferroelectric crystal structure in a one-step process, utilizing a specific copolymer as filament and a commercial 3D printer for printing. Some interesting results were obtained, including the retention of ferroelectric properties and an increase in crystallinity after annealing.
This Letter presents the possibility of 3D print polymer forms with a ferroelectric crystal structure in a one-step process by using the fused deposition modeling method. The approach does not require any additional equipment, other than an extruder for filament production and a commercial 3D printer to fabricate ferroelectric polymer forms. By using the copolymer of vinylidene fluoride and tetrafluoroethylene as a filament for 3D printing, complex spatial structures, such as the gyroid form, are accessible. Compared to polyvinylidene fluoride, the copolymer of vinylidene fluoride and tetrafluoroethylene retains its ferroelectric properties even after melting in the 3D printing process and soldification. The x-ray diffraction investigation shows that the 3D forms are having a planar zigzag conformation on macromolecule scales, which relates to a crystal structure with ferroelectric properties. Annealing the 3D forms at a temperature of 110 & DEG;C for 12 h does not cause any changes to the spatial polymer structures but leads to an increase in the degree of crystallinity by more than 20%. This result contributes to an increase in the ferroelectric crystalline phase content by & SIM;17% and the Curie temperature by & SIM;7 & DEG;C in contrast to non-annealed 3D forms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据