4.6 Article

Electrical conductivity in oxygen-substituted SrTiO3-δ films

期刊

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
卷 119, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0072225

关键词

-

资金

  1. Czech Science Foundation [19-09671S]
  2. European Structural and Investment Funds
  3. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [SOLID21-CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000760]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enhancement of electrical conductivity in ABO(3) perovskite oxide ferroelectrics, such as SrTiO3 thin films, can be achieved by introducing oxygen vacancies or substitutions. The hopping mechanism of conductivity with small polarons as charge carriers is evidenced, and oxygen vacancies/substitutions facilitate hopping probability by generating sites for carrier localization. The hopping conductivity shows a unique increase with an electric field, which can benefit important ferroelectric devices.
Enhancement of electrical conductivity in fundamentally insulating ABO(3) perovskite oxide ferroelectrics is crucial for innovative applications in resistive switching, photovoltaics, and catalysis. One of the methods to raise conductivity in bulk crystals or ceramics relies on the possibility to remove and/or substitute oxygen atoms. Here, we explored this approach for thin films of the representative perovskite oxide SrTiO3. Small-signal AC conductivity was investigated in epitaxial and polycrystalline films, where oxygen vacancies (V-O), nitrogen (N), or hydrogen (H) were introduced in situ during film growth. Hopping mechanism of conductivity was evidenced by the observed strong growth of AC conductivity with temperature, frequency, and AC voltage in all films. Small polarons were identified as charge carriers. Oxygen vacancies/substitutions were suggested to facilitate hopping probability by generating sites for carrier localization. Important ferroelectric devices were proposed to benefit from the revealed hopping conductivity owing to its unique increase with an electric field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据