4.6 Article

Ultrafast electron dynamics in platinum and gold thin films driven by optical and terahertz fields

期刊

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
卷 120, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0068086

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the ultrafast electron dynamics triggered by terahertz and optical pulses in thin platinum and gold films through probing their transient optical reflectivity. The response of the platinum film to an intense terahertz pulse is similar to the optically induced one, while the gold film exhibits a much smaller terahertz pulse-induced reflectivity change with the opposite sign compared to the optical case. The results provide fundamental insights into the ultrafast processes relevant to modern electro- and magneto-optical applications.
We investigate the ultrafast electron dynamics triggered by terahertz and optical pulses in thin platinum and gold films by probing their transient optical reflectivity. The response of the platinum film to an intense terahertz pulse is similar to the optically induced one and can be described by a two-temperature model with a 20% larger electron-phonon coupling for the terahertz-driven dynamics compared to the optically induced one, ascribed to an additional nonthermal electron-phonon coupling contribution. Surprisingly, gold films exhibit a much smaller terahertz pulse-induced reflectivity change and with a sign opposite to the optical case. We explain this remarkable observation with field emission of electrons due to Fowler-Nordheim tunneling, enabled in samples with thicknesses below the structural percolation threshold, where nanostructuring promotes near-field enhancement. Our results provide a fundamental insight into the ultrafast processes relevant to modern electro- and magneto-optical applications. (C) 2022 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据