4.6 Article

Hole mobility behavior in Al-gradient polarization-induced p-type AlGaN grown on GaN template

期刊

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
卷 120, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0070599

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polarization-induced p-type behavior is produced by growing a series of AlGaN samples with decreasing Al contents along the c-axis on GaN templates using molecular beam epitaxy. The dependence of hole mobility on the central Al content is studied, showing a monotonic decrease with two different slopes in the two Al-content ranges divided at around 40%. The relaxation of tensile strain observed at Al contents higher than 40% leads to an increase in overall polarization gradient and hole concentration.
A series of samples with their AlGaN layers of decreasing Al contents along the c-axis are grown on GaN templates with molecular beam epitaxy for producing polarization-induced p-type behaviors. By fixing the Al-gradient rate at 0.15%/nm and AlGaN layer thickness at 100 nm while changing the central Al content in those samples, we study the dependence of hole mobility on the central Al content. As the central Al content increases, hole mobility decreases monotonically with two different decreasing slopes in the two Al-content ranges divided at similar to 40%. Tensile strain relaxation is observed when the Al content is higher than similar to 40%, resulting in the increase in overall polarization gradient and, hence, hole concentration. Although the variation of the alloy scattering strength of hole in AlGaN can support the smaller decreasing slope of hole mobility in the Al-content range of >40%, other factors, such as piezoelectric scattering and bound charge distribution, may need to be considered for a complete interpretation. Compared with Mg-doped p-type AlGaN of 25% in an Al content, the polarization-induced p-type AlGaN can provide us with a higher hole mobility level at about the same hole concentration. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据