4.6 Article

The influence of in situ ozone on structure and transport properties for perovskite stannate La-doped BaSnO3 epitaxial films

期刊

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
卷 120, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0076939

关键词

-

资金

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation [LZ21F040001]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2021M703313]
  3. Ningbo Yongjiang Talent Introduction Programme
  4. Outstanding Research Associate Funding Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the influence of in situ ozone treatment on the structure and carrier transport in La-doped BaSnO3 (BLSO) films. It is found that introducing ozone during the film growth inhibits the formation of oxygen vacancies and Sn2+ ions. The reduction of oxygen vacancies leads to an increase in threading dislocation density and deterioration of carrier mobility.
Here we investigate the influence of in situ ozone treatment on structure and carrier transport in La-doped BaSnO3 BLSO) films. It is found that introducing ozone during the film growth significantly inhibits the formation of oxygen vacancies and the occurrence of Sn2+ ions. The amount of oxygen vacancies decreases consistently with the increase of the ozone content, which further increases the in-plane lattice constant along with the relief of the in-plane compressive strain. More importantly, the reduction of oxygen vacancies gives rise to the augment of the threading dislocation density in the BLSO films, leading to the deterioration of carrier mobility. These findings demonstrate that the existence of Sn2+ ions does not apparently suppress the electron mobility in BLSO films, and the presence of oxygen vacancies is beneficial for reducing the density of threading dislocations, facilitating the mobility enhancement. All these findings would be beneficial for understanding the role of oxygen vacancy in carrier transport properties and for further optimizing the mobility of BLSO films.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据