4.5 Article

3D Fourier ghost imaging via semi-calibrated photometric stereo

期刊

APPLIED OPTICS
卷 61, 期 1, 页码 253-261

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/AO.447910

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Research Council of the Philippines

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, three-dimensional computational ghost imaging was achieved using multiple photoresistors as single-pixel detectors with the semi-calibrated lighting approach. The depth map and surface normals of the scene were retrieved accurately by performing imaging in the spatial frequency domain and applying semi-calibrated photometric stereo (SCPS) to the obtained spectra.
We achieved three-dimensional (3D) computational ghost imaging with multiple photoresistors serving as single-pixel detectors using the semi-calibrated lighting approach. We performed imaging in the spatial frequency domain by having each photoresistor obtain the Fourier spectrum of the scene at a low spectral coverage ratio of 5%. To retrieve a depth map of a scene, we inverted, apodized, and applied semi-calibrated photometric stereo (SCPS) to the spectra. At least 93.5% accuracy was achieved for the 3D results of the apodized set of images applied with SCPS in comparison with the ground truth. Furthermore, intensity error map statistics obtained at least 97.0% accuracy for the estimated surface normals using our method. Our system does not need special calibration objects or any additional optical components to perform accurate 3D imaging, making it easily adaptable. Our method can be applied in current imaging systems where multiple detectors operating at any wavelength are used for two-dimensional (2D) imaging, such as imaging cosmological objects. Employing the idea of changing light patterns to illuminate a target scene and having stored information about these patterns, the data retrieved by one detector will give the 2D information while the multiple-detector system can be used to get a 3D profile. (C) 2021 Optica Publishing Group

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据