4.6 Article

Accelerated homotopy perturbation iteration method for a non-smooth nonlinear ill-posed problem

期刊

APPLIED NUMERICAL MATHEMATICS
卷 169, 期 -, 页码 122-145

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnum.2021.06.008

关键词

Iterative regularization method; Non-smooth nonlinear ill-posed problems; Homotopy perturbation; Sequential subspace optimization method

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11901373, 12071184, 11871180]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [GK202003007]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LY19A010009]
  4. Major R & D Plan of Science and Technology of Zhejiang [2019C03099]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a fast iterative algorithm based on the J-order homotopy perturbation method is proposed for solving the nonlinear ill-posed problem. The sequential subspace optimization technique is introduced to accelerate the convergence speed, and numerical experiments are conducted to demonstrate its effectiveness.
In this paper, a fast iterative algorithm based on J-order homotopy perturbation method is proposed for the nonlinear ill-posed problem whose forward operator is not Gateaux differentiable. The Bouligand subderivative of the forward operator is utilized to replace the Frechet derivative in iteration system. The sequential subspace optimization technique is introduced to accelerate the convergence speed, which regards the correction term of homotopy perturbation as multiple search directions to update the new iterate. To this end, the current iteration is sequentially projected to the stripes whose width is determined by search directions, the nonlinearity of the forward operator and noise level. We present the convergence analysis based on the asymptotic stability estimates and a generalized tangential cone condition. Numerical experiments are performed to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. (C) 2021 IMACS. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据