4.7 Article

Cooperative inventory games in multi-echelon supply chains under carbon tax policy: Vertical or horizontal?

期刊

APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING
卷 99, 期 -, 页码 166-203

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2021.06.013

关键词

Supply chain coordination; Cooperative game; Inventory cost; Carbon tax

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the impact of carbon tax policy on inventory games in multi-echelon supply chains, proposing a coordination mechanism using cooperative game theory concepts. Results show that carbon tax can reduce carbon emissions levels, decrease costs, and increase cooperation savings.
This paper studies carbon tax policy in inventory games of multi-echelon supply chains. Four structures are considered with regard to the decision-making of supply chain mem-bers (decentralized, vertical downward cooperation, vertical upward cooperation, and hor-izontal cooperation). The purposes are to find the solutions of inventory games at each co-operation scheme, to compare strategies, and to examine the impact of the carbon tax on costs, emissions, and cooperation savings. A coordination mechanism with synchronized cycles is proposed, using cooperative game theory concepts in SC centralization. Closed-form equilibrium values were calculated for the optimal replenishment cycles, costs, and carbon emissions functions. For this intent, an algebraic method was deployed for vertical cooperation games. Though, other games were solved by an exact solution method. The numerical examples examined the impacts of the carbon tax on each structure and com -pared optimal solutions. Moreover, the impact of inventory and carbon emissions param-eters on the cost and carbon emissions savings from cooperation settings were evaluated, indicating that SCs can reduce both costs and carbon emissions through cooperation. Ad-ditionally, it was found that the carbon tax can reduce the level of carbon emissions, while simultaneously decreasing coalition costs and emissions savings. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据