4.8 Article

A locational marginal price for frequency balancing operations in regulation markets

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 308, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118306

关键词

Frequency control; Optimization methods; Power system economics; Power system modeling; Power systems; Stochastic approximation

资金

  1. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program [DGE-1747503]
  2. Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Graduate Education at the University of Wisconsin-Madison
  3. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, United States

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The integration of more renewable energy resources on the electric grid necessitates market design considerations to balance power intermittency. This study proposes a new locational marginal price for frequency regulating reserves, improving alignment with the wholesale energy market.
The integration of increasingly more renewable energy resources on the electric grid requires consideration of market design for balancing power intermittency. We propose a new locational marginal price for the frequency regulating reserves currently utilized by system operators to balance random power fluctuations on electric grids. Like the widely used wholesale energy price, our proposed price considers the locational effects of delivering electricity services across a congested transmission system. We further propose a regulation market settlement policy which requires market participants with variable power injections to pay based on their frequency regulation needs instead of their energy needs. The calculation of the proposed price and market design is demonstrated using a test case. The results of the test case are further generalized to larger systems. We find the proposed price is more efficient than current regulation market clearing prices and better aligns regulation market design with the wholesale energy market. The limitations and market implications of this proposal are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据