4.8 Article

Impact of carbon pricing on distributed energy systems planning

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 301, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117324

关键词

Distributed energy systems; Carbon tax; Optimal planning; Energy storage; Energy hub design

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the impact of carbon pricing on the design of distributed energy systems, using Singapore as a case study. The results show that increasing carbon pricing can reduce environmental footprint but may also lead to increased primary energy consumption, especially when the cost of natural gas decreases.
Carbon pricing is being implemented by several governments to curb CO2 emissions. This work studies its impact on distributed energy systems design which are powered by both renewable and fossil fuels. In particular, the analyses investigate a real case study situated in Singapore, characterized by cooling and electricity demands. The goal of the analyses is to determine whether carbon pricing does impact design choices in meeting the energy demands of a user located in a cooling dominated region, and secondly in assessing the effectiveness of carbon pricing as a CO2 emissions mitigation policy. This is achieved by investigating the optimal design of the energy systems meeting the demands of the test case under different carbon pricing and primary energy supply costs assumptions. The results indicate that the optimal design under current conditions heavily relies on PV with more than 10 MWp worth of capacity and that an increasing carbon pricing would lead to a lower environmental footprint. But if the supply costs for natural gas were to lower, the optimal design would switch to relying on a combined cooling heat and power-based electricity generation system up to 3 MWe, increasing the primary energy consumptions regardless of the carbon pricing scheme in place. This would also happen even at significantly higher prices than the scheme under evaluation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据