4.8 Article

Surface states regulation of sulfide-based photoanode for photoelectrochemical water splitting

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 300, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120717

关键词

CdIn2S4; Photoanode; Adaptive junction; Surface states; Photoelectrochemical water splitting

资金

  1. Young Scholars Program of Shandong University
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21701099]
  3. Taishan Scholars Climbing Program of Shandong Province [tspd20150201]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Regulating the surface states distribution on the photoanode/electrolyte interface is crucial to photoelectrochemical water splitting. The development of a CdIn2S4/InOx/NiFe-LDH adaptive junction improves PEC performance and stability, with experimental characterizations showing the influence of interfacial structural regulation on surface states distribution and charge carrier density.
Regulating the surface states distribution on the photoanode/electrolyte interface is crucial to photo electrochemical (PEC) water splitting. Here we develop a CdIn2S4/InOx/NiFe-LDH adaptive junction to improve the PEC performance and stability of bare CdIn2S4, which achieves a photocurrent density of 5.47 mA cm(-2) at 1.23 V-RHE as well as good durability under AM 1.5G illumination without sacrificial reagent. The experimental characterizations evidence that both the charge carrier density (N-d) and surface states distribution (N-ss) alter along with the interfacial structural regulation in the CdIn2S4/InOx/NiFe-LDH photoanode, and a proper ratio of N-ss/N-d guarantee the optimal photocurrent. Meanwhile, a strained surface states distribution and negative shifted N-ss center facilitate the charge transfer and interfacial water oxidation kinetics as well. This work highlights the influence of interfacial structural regulation on the entangled surface states distribution and charge carrier density and may inspire more excellent work on designing other efficient photoanodes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据