4.8 Article

Operando mechanistic studies of selective oxidation of glycerol to dihydroxyacetone over amorphous cobalt oxide

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 300, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120723

关键词

Amorphous cobalt oxide; Glycerol oxidation; operando Raman spectroscopy; Structural evolution

资金

  1. Young Scholar Fellowship Program by Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) in Taiwan [MOST110-2636-E-011-004]
  2. National Taiwan University of Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, cobalt oxide (CoOx) was shown to be an efficient and selective electrocatalyst for producing value-added dihydroxyacetone (DHA) from glycerol. Operando Raman spectroscopy revealed structural transformations between CoOx and oxyhydroxides, establishing correlations between applied potential, surface chemistry, and product distribution. This suggests the potential for using inexpensive materials for electrochemical biomass upgrading and studying catalyst activity under realistic conditions.
In this work, cobalt oxide (CoOx) has been demonstrated as an efficient and selective electrocatalyst for producing value-added dihydroxyacetone (DHA) from industrial by-product glycerol. Under optimized conditions, DHA with high selectivity up to 45% and a high production rate of 9.6 mu mol h-1 cm-2 is obtained at high current density over 3 mA cm-2 without the occurrence of the oxygen evolution reaction. Operando Raman spectroscopy features the potential-induced structural transformation between CoOx and oxyhydroxides from which a correlation among applied potential, surface chemistry of electrocatalyst, and product distribution are built. These results point toward the viability of using inexpensive materials for electrochemical biomass upgrading as well as providing opportunities for studying structural evolution and activity origin of catalysts under realistic working conditions that can be widely extended to most electrocatalytic biomass valorization processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据