4.8 Article

Cascaded multiple-step hole transfer for enhancing photoelectrochemical water splitting

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 296, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120313

关键词

Energy conversion; Interfacial modulation; Hole transfer; Photoelectrochemistry; Water splitting

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21575115, 22001193]
  2. Program for Chang Jiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team, Ministry of Education, China [IRT16R61]
  3. Program of Gansu Provincial Higher Education Research Project [2017D01]
  4. Special Fund Project for the Central Government to Guide Local Science and Technology Development
  5. Program of Tianjin Science and Technology Major Project and Engineering [19ZXYXSY00090]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a novel multi-step hole transfer strategy to accelerate hole transport and suppress surface recombination, by constructing an effective hole transfer channel to enhance the performance of photoanodes.
Serious surface recombination and sluggish reaction kinetics hamper the photoelectrochemical (PEC) performance from being efficient. Although coupling oxygen evolution catalysts on photoanodes to accelerate electrode reactions has been demonstrated an effective strategy to enhance photocurrent, the surface recombination still limits the performance to an ideal level. Herein, a novel multi-step hole transfer strategy is developed for accelerating hole transport and thus suppressing the surface recombination. In this system, porphyrin and polyaniline both act as hole transfer layers, which construct an effective stair-stepping hole transfer channel to ensure much more holes take part in water oxidation process. This simple interface modulation system exhibits a remarkable photocurrent of 4.5 mA cm-2 at 1.23 V (vs. reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE), AM 1.5 G illumination) accompanied with good stability and provides a promising strategy for the design of efficient photoanodes for solar conversion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据