4.8 Article

Hierarchical CoP@Ni2P catalysts for pH-universal hydrogen evolution at high current density

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 296, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120350

关键词

Hierarchical; Heterostructure; pH-universal; Hydrogen evolution reaction; High current density

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51776094, 91963129]
  2. Foundation of Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee [JCYJ20180302174021198]
  3. Basic Research Project of Science and Technology Plan of Shenzhen [JCYJ20180504165655180]
  4. Special Funds for the Cultivation of Guangdong College Students' Scientific and Technological Innovation [pdjh2020c0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research team successfully synthesized a hierarchical bimetal phosphide electrocatalyst on nickel foam using a simple method. The catalyst exhibits excellent performance at high current densities and durability, providing a new approach for large-scale hydrogen production in various pH ranges.
For large-scale implementation of electrochemical hydrogen production, it is essential to develop electrocatalysts that work well at high current densities over a wide pH range. Herein, we use a facile method to synthesize a hierarchical bimetal phosphide (CoP@Ni2P) on nickel foam, which requires very low overpotentials to achieve the benchmark 10 mA cm-2 (e.g., 16 mV in alkaline media). Furthermore, the CoP@Ni2P can deliver a high current density of 500 mA cm-2 at small overpotentials and show no obvious decay after the durability test for over 48 h at all pH levels. The outstanding catalytic performance is attributed to the superaerophobicity of the electrode surface, fast electron transport as well as the increased number of exposed active sites caused by the hierarchical structure and the synergistic effect of the heterostructures. Consequently, this work provides an advanced transition metal-based phosphide for large-scale hydrogen production in all pH ranges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据