4.8 Article

Effect of phosphate on peroxymonosulfate activation: Accelerating generation of sulfate radical and underlying mechanism

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 298, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120532

关键词

Peroxymonosulfate; Phosphate; Sulfate radicals; Hydroxyl radicals; Density Functional Theory

资金

  1. Young Scholars Program of Shandong University [2018WLJH52, 2018WLJH54]
  2. Shenzhen Sci-ence and Technology Research and Development Funds [JCYJ20190807094003691]
  3. Major Technological Innovation En-gineering Project of Shandong Province [2020CXGC011204]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The presence of phosphate was found to increase the effectiveness of PMS activation for pollutants removal in AOPs, promoting the generation of SO4 center dot- through efficient breaking of the O-O bond of PMS. The yields of SO4 center dot- were linearly dependent on phosphate concentration, while the yields of .OH remained constant.
Effect of phosphate on pollutant removal was widely investigated in various peroxumonosulfate-based advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) but the role of phosphate was controversial. Many studies also used phosphate as buffer in PMS-based AOPs. This study shows that phosphate promoted PMS activation for pollutants removal. Therefore, PMS activation capacity of some strategies may be overestimated when conducted in the phosphate buffer. Importantly, the results of radical quenching tests, radical probes and reaction stoichiometries indicated that the yields of SO4 center dot- was elevated by the presence of phosphate and linearly depended on phosphate concentration, while the yields of .OH remained constant. Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculation confirmed that PO43- and HPO42- could efficiently break O-O bond of PMS, promoting the generation of SO4 center dot- for contaminants decomposition. These results illuminated the role of phosphate in AOPs utilizing PMS and uncovered the underlying mechanism of PMS activation by phosphate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据